-
Planning and Design
- Requirement 01 Risk management plan for AI system and execution of the plan
-
Requirement 02 Organization of an AI governance system
- 02-1 Have you established guidelines and policies on AI governance?
- 02-2 Have you formed an AI governance group and reviewed the composition of the group?
- 02-3 Is the AI governance being supervised to ensure proper implementation?
- 02-4 Has the AI governance group reviewed the differences between the new and previous systems?
- Requirement 03 Development of a plan to test trustworthiness in the AI system
-
Data Collection and Processing
-
Requirement 04 Provision of detailed information for data utilization
-
04-1 Is there detailed information to support the accurate comprehension and utilization of data?
- 04-1a Have you explained the data attributes before and after cleansing?
- 04-1b Have you sorted data into training data and metadata and is there a specification document for each of them?
- 04-1c Have you explained the reason for selecting the protected attributes and whether they were reflected?
- 04-1d Were data labelers trained and have you provided them with work instructions?
- 04-2 Is data provenance documented and managed?
-
04-1 Is there detailed information to support the accurate comprehension and utilization of data?
- Requirement 05 Inspection of abnormal data to ensure data robustness
-
Requirement 06 Removal of bias in the collected and processed training data
- 06-1 Have you prepared measures to mitigate bias due to human and physical elements in data collection?
- 06-2 Have you analyzed features used in training and prepared selection criteria?
- 06-3 Have you checked and prevented potential biases in data labeling?
- 06-4 Have you conducted sampling to prevent bias in data?
-
Requirement 04 Provision of detailed information for data utilization
-
AI Model Development
- Requirement 07 Ensuring security and compatibility of the open-source library
- Requirement 08 Removal of bias in the AI model
- Requirement 09 Establishment of defensive measures for AI model attacks
-
Requirement 10 Explanation of AI model specifications and the inference results
- 10-1 Do you provide evidence for users to accept the generation process of the model’s inference results?
- 10-2 Have you transparently provided the specification of the model on the AI model specification document?
- 10-3 When needed, do you provide an explanation about the inference results of the AI model?
-
System Development
- Requirement 11 Removal of potential bias in the implementation of the AI system
-
Requirement 12 Safe mode of AI system and establishment of a process for notification of problems
-
12-1 Have you implemented a safe mode that can respond to problems such as attacks, low performance, and social issues?
- 12-1a Have you prepared an exception handling policy for such problems?
- 12-1b Have you implemented a security technique to reinforce the security of the AI system?
- 12-1c Have you considered a decision-making method that includes humans to mitigate the uncertainty of the AI system?
- 12-1d Are guidance and action on handling expected user error provided?
- 12-2 Does the system perform the function of alerting the operator if a problem occurs in the AI system?
-
12-1 Have you implemented a safe mode that can respond to problems such as attacks, low performance, and social issues?
-
Requirement 13 Improvement of users’ comprehension of the explanation of the AI system
- 13-1 Have you analyzed user characteristics and constraints in the AI system?
-
13-2 Have you provided a thorough explanation based on user characteristics?
- 13-2a Have you established criteria for the evaluation of explanation according to user characteristics?
- 13-2b Have you used terms that are appropriate to user characteristics?
- 13-2c Have you used accurate expressions to lead users to specific behaviors and comprehension?
- 13-2d Are the location and timing where an explanation is needed appropriate?
- 13-2e Have you utilized various user survey techniques to evaluate user experience?
-
Operation and Monitoring
-
Requirement 14 Ensuring traceability and modification history of the AI system
- 14-1 Have you established measures to track the AI system’s decision-making?
-
14-2 Have you obtained the modification history of training data and managed the impact of data modifications?
- 14-2a Have you prepared measures to track the data flow and lineage?
- 14-2b Have you developed measures to monitor modifications in the data source?
- 14-2c Have you managed the versions during data change?
- 14-2d Do you provide information to stakeholders when data change?
- 14-2e When new data have been collected, do you reevaluate the performance of the AI model?
- Requirement 15 Explanation about the scope of services provided and the subject of interactions
-
Requirement 14 Ensuring traceability and modification history of the AI system
-
07-1aHave you used an active open-source library?• Open-source libraries can pose hazards to the healthcare AI in development if their providers cease to improve and update them [35]. You must seek to expedite research and clinical collaboration in medical imaging and other specialized medical disciplines, and employ more active open-source libraries to mitigate these risks. Consider introducing, if at all possible, libraries created or contributed by healthcare professionals, medical professional groups, and medical professional centers.
• There are opinions that the stability of an open-source library can be achieved by the active participation of many developers. Therefore, you must carefully examine the development process of the open-source library to use.
• According to The Open Source Software Governance Guide for Businesses (National IT Industry Promotion Agency), examining the activity level of an open-source project could be one of the ways to confirm its stability. Whether the open source is discussed in an active community and whether there is active collaboration among the community members could be significant markers for choosing that open source.✓ For an open-source library managed by GitHub, you can identify the potential for continuous development and if there is an ongoing active development of open sources by examining the number of open issues and pull requests, and the last commit date.
✓ You can also check the activity level of the library through simple measurements like the number of Stack Overflow questions related to the open source, the number of open-source downloads, and the number of query results in Google.
✓ Papers with Code can determine the level of activation of recent libraries, datasets, frameworks, etc. when comparing and analyzing papers and research results by examining user ratings and contributions to the library. In Papers with Code, they are organized into higher-level concepts, such as health application programs and project categories, so care must be taken when examining only the healthcare sections.
✓ Red Hat, an American software company, continues to develop open-source-based business models (e.g. ensuring compatibility, strengthening security, providing technical support) and applies improvements suggested by members of the community when updating its open-source library. Thus, open-source libraries based on a business model can also be considered a project actively participated in by individuals and companies.
